Subpoenas asked KU for info on recruitments, ordered officials to testify (ESPN)

Thanks for the link, port. KUSports.com also addressed the release.

Bottom line is "nothing new here".
No new names.
No new info.
Nothing about a timeline for anything being resolved.

I did note that the ESPN article made it sound as if both Preston and De Sousa were being influenced to attend KU. From the way things have been presented in the official indictments, Preston, yes, but upon analysis, De Sousa no.

Regardless, as no KU officials were involved and Preston never played, Preston is not a KU issue, although he is a problem for adidas.

No KU officials were involved in De Sousa's case, either, and there is no evidence De Sousa knew anything about any alleged payments. The only possible harm for KU and De Sousa then is the post-Cam Newton NCAA rule attaching guilt to the student-athlete for the misdeeds of another in his "camp" (in this case his guardian). But the information released to date indicates that if said guardian got money it was to coerce Silvio to go to Maryland. But Silvio insisted on going to KU. That seems to make it pretty clear that (1) Silvio did not know anything about any back room transactions and (2) he was not influenced by those transactions to go to KU. Now, if his guardian went out and got $ from adidas so he could pay UnderArmor back the $ he got to push Silvio to Maryland, that's something else TOTALLY unrelated to Silvio going to KU. Even with the Cam Newton rule, I just don't see the NCAA having a case regarding Silvio's eligibility at Kansas. Maryland, yes, Kansas no.

My question is why aren't we hearing more from ESPN about Arizona? About Duke? About Louisville? Maryland is the one really on the hot seat re: De Sousa, but they repeatedly are only mentioned in passing. None of the other big name schools are getting ANY press this off season, and their stuff was even more damaging for their programs.

Methinks there are a lot of KU haters out there.