Anything pertaining to basketball: college, pro, HS, recruiting, TV coverage
Mid season projection - who leaves early?
- HawkErrant
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- b82, g84 Lift the chorus...
- Posts: 6852
- Thank you received: 5200
Silvio fills the empty ride for this year, bringing KU up to 13 scholarships filled this year, and just 2 “for sure” openings.
KU has 3 more recruits signed for next season.
Who leaves (early entry or transfer) to free up the needed third ride?
I don’t check NBA mock drafts myself, but last I read about the projections only DG and Svi were in them, and as second rounders.
Preston was initially projected OAD, but his sitting certainly hasn’t helped him.
Dok is huge, but still raw - and not showing up in the mocks.
Some thought Vick would have a breakout year. Hasn’t happened.
Same for Newman.
Lightfoot is not projected to get much playing time next season, but he has loved KU his whole life, and is not likely to transfer.
But somebody is going to have to go to enable KU to provide scholarships for Quentin Grimes (Rivals #10), Devon Dotson (#17) and David McCormack (#34) next year.
And will there be at least two, creating a position for #6 SG Romeo Langford should KU manage to beat out front runners Vanderbilt and Indiana for him later this season?
Who do you think it will be?
"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one's lifetime." - Mark Twain "Innocents Abroad"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Share this page:
- mtnMan
- Offline
- Premium Member
- Posts: 155
- Thank you received: 106
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- big g
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 168
- Thank you received: 194
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- big g
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 168
- Thank you received: 194
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- HawkErrant
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- b82, g84 Lift the chorus...
- Posts: 6852
- Thank you received: 5200
Clemson (76%) the odds on favorite for him now
UK 10%
KU, UNC each 5%
Remaining gurus unclear on his destination.
"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one's lifetime." - Mark Twain "Innocents Abroad"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CorpusJayhawk
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1847
- Thank you received: 3640
Devonte’ - Graduated
Svi - Graduated
Dok - 7 footers don’t grow on trees and someone in the NBA would take a flyer if he declared. But I hope reason prevails and he realizes his short and long-term potential is best with him staying. I say 85% he comes back
Malik - less than 50% that he transfers and/or declares. 70% he returns
Vick - No way he declares and I can’t imagine him working this hard only to transfer. 95% he stays
Marcus - Self loves this kind of kid. He fits this system. Of course no possible way he declares. 95+% he stays.
Mitch - Loves KU. Wouldn’t leave for playing time. He would rather compete for PT at KU. He is Crimson and Blue. 99% he stays
Preston - Let’s say he is cleared to play here in a week or two. He plays well and shows his potential than he declares. He doesn’t play well but shows some potential, he leaves. If he doesn’t get cleared he to play this year he is not welcome back, he leaves. 90% he declares or transfers.
De Sousa - Can’t think of any reason he would leave. 90% he returns
Moore and the two Lawson’s...who the heck knows. Can’t see them leaving.
Don't worry about the mules, just load the wagon!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- replayloungehawk
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 403
- Thank you received: 406
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- AZhawk87
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 573
- Thank you received: 680
The only question I have on your logic is Dok. I agree fully with your assessment of his skills, but big guys with athleticism are rare, and also are at risk for more career ending back, knee and foot injuries. They make good practice players, and there's always room at the end of an NBA bench for a 7 foot 300 pounder. They have to get the money as soon as possible, so if there's any chance he goes in first round, he's gone.
Preston is also the unknown. Way too many variables. The downside for him is that he wasn't spectacular in the limited time he got to play.
Finally, Malik may see more value in D League than staying another year. College doesn't seem to suit him that well, and his scoring "potential" could be evaluated in a D League atmosphere.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- HawkErrant
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- b82, g84 Lift the chorus...
- Posts: 6852
- Thank you received: 5200
replayloungehawk wrote: I will say I don't think Vick will declare for the NBA but how could you say he hasn't had a breakout year? He's averaging 15.3 PPG , 6 rpg, 3.3 apg, shooting 54% from the field and 44% from three. What constitutes a breakout year? He has doubled his points and rebounding from last year and he's shooting 10% better from the field and 7% better from three. Seems like a breakout season to me...
I will agree he has had a solid year for a major D1 college basketball player, and we could call that a breakout year. But the folks that have been saying he would have a breakout year and leave early aren’t talking about “breakout” in that sense, but in the sense that his NBA draft stock would improve to late first round potential. Up through December his status had in fact improved to early second rounder (I just checked out a few sites myself instead of just relying on what others have noted), but his play in January can only be considered a backslide so far for him.
So you can say he has had a breakout year if you like, but we have to hope that he hasn’t peaked and that his conference play improves. If it doesn’t he looks to completely drop out of the mocks.
"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one's lifetime." - Mark Twain "Innocents Abroad"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JRhawk
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 704
- Thank you received: 358
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- HawkErrant
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- b82, g84 Lift the chorus...
- Posts: 6852
- Thank you received: 5200
"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one's lifetime." - Mark Twain "Innocents Abroad"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- replayloungehawk
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 403
- Thank you received: 406
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JRhawk
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 704
- Thank you received: 358
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- NotOstertag
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1948
- Thank you received: 2140
Dok is also a possibility, but he's still a 'project' who could boost is draft position with another year of seasoning.
As for Vick's "breakout year" I too disagree that he's proven that to be the case vs.his first 2 years.
Yes his numbers are up but that doesn't tell the whole story:
>Minutes: 33.3 up from 24.4. But with no depth on this team, of course his numbers would be up.
>Points: 15.3 vs. 7.4 last year looks good, but if you look per-minute, it's 0.46 vs 0.3. So "doubling" his output is really only a 50% increase per minute, and I'd argue that we're asking him to score more than we were counting on him to do so last year. He's also shooting almost twice as many threes this year, further boosting his numbers.
>To me, the #1 thing from stamping this year as "breakout" however is his recent performance. Over the last 3 games he's averaged only 6 points per game while averaging 32 minutes per game. That's .18 points per minute. With the exception of the Texas game, he's played pretty lackluster ball in league play. Couple that with his crazy athleticism and it doesn't seem to compute and appears to be under-achieving.
Not knocking him as I think he's a great ball player with huge upside. He just seems to have been mysteriously absent a few too many times in games this year for me to feel like he's having what I'd personally consider a "breakout" year. Better yes. Breakout no.
"When I was a freshman, I remember Coach Naismith telling us how important it was to play good defense." - Mitch Lightfoot
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.