Ads pay for this site.
Click here to
contact the Admin.

Krauthammer: Why CJ Roberts voted with the liberals on the Court

June 30, 2012 12:56PM
[news.investors.com]

From the column:

Result? The law stands, thus obviating any charge that a partisan court overturned duly passed legislation. And yet at the same time the Commerce Clause is reined in. By denying that it could justify the imposition of an individual mandate, Roberts draws the line against the inexorable decades-old expansion of congressional power under the Commerce Clause fig leaf.

Law upheld, Supreme Court's reputation for neutrality maintained. Commerce Clause contained, constitutional principle of enumerated powers reaffirmed.


ObamaCare is now essentially upheld. There's only one way it can be overturned. The same way it was passed — elect a new president and a new Congress. That's undoubtedly what Roberts is saying: Your job, not mine. I won't make it easy for you.

__________________________

Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall.--Ronald Reagan, June 12, 1987
SubjectAuthorPosted

  Krauthammer: Why CJ Roberts voted with the liberals on the Court

boulderhawkJune 30, 2012 12:56PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Share this page:


News | Daily Links | 2011-12 Jayhawks | Historical Stats | The Rock Chalk Board
Tradition | Recruiting News | Fan Zone | Links

Further information: privacy information, about this site, feedback, advertising info

Copyright ©1995-2012 Rock Chalk Zone, All Rights Reserved